Interview 1:
For my first interview, I decided to interview my grandma, who doesn't own a smartphone or engage with technology often outside of simple phone calls. When speaking to her, she gave me a lot of insight on how even though as someone who is younger and is constantly engaging with technology, this is not true for every person. Without a smartphone, my grandma would not have access to this solution to the problem of dealing with wait times at restaurants, therefore she is outside the boundary. Although she goes to restaurants, she is not used to having the ability of technology to help her solve problems and therefore would not use this solution.
Interview 2:
For my second interview, I spoke with the manager of a small restaurant in Gainesville. I spoke to him about the issue of wait times and told him my suggested solution. His opinion was very insightful as he held a unique perspective as an owner who would have to dedicate time to update the wait times on the app. He explained to me that he probably wouldn't have the time or resources to dedicate to the solution I proposed and therefore would be outside the boundary. While he does care about his customers and their experience, he said that posting longer wait times might deter guests before they even arrive at the location, possibly driving away business.
Interview 3:
For my next interview, I discussed my problem and solution to my roommate, a college student who rarely goes to sit down restaurants. While I originally considered college students within my boundary, she explained that she most likely wouldn't use the app I proposed as she rarely goes to sit down restaurants and having the app wouldn't be worth it for the times she does, especially if she had to pay for the app. She also pointed out that if she was dining at a sit-down restaurant then it was most likely for a special occasion where a wait time would be considered before choosing a restaurant and arriving.
Interview 4:
My fourth interview I decided to speak to my brother, one of the most patient people I know and ask his opinion on my hypothesis. I knew before speaking to him that he most likely would be outside the boundary as he is someone who rarely cares about waiting and has an immense amount of patience. His thought process on the solution I proposed was that although it might be helpful for consumers who heavily consider wait times when selecting a restaurant, he personally does not consider this factor when dining out and therefore would not use the app. Even if he was to use the app, it would not really affect his decision as he doesn't mind waiting to be seated before dining out and considers himself a "go with the flow" personality.
Interview 5:
Finally, I spoke with a close family friend who I knew was notorious to only dine at restaurants that allowed reservations in order to avoid any wait and inconveniences. The original population that I thought was within my boundary was all customers who dined out, however, I am now realizing this is not true with this interviewing further proving that point. Although he often dines out, he chooses to make reservations every time because he believes it makes the whole process faster and it is the smart thing to do. He pointed out that, most sit-down restaurants allow reservations and if you know you''re planning to go out to dinner, why not just make a reservation? This interviewed really opened my eyes to the fact that even though my solution was intelligent, there was no guarantee that every consumer would think the same.
Inside the boundary:
Who: Consumers who are actively engaging with technology and who consider wait times an important factor in their restaurant experience so much so that they would use an app to view waits times for restaurants in their area.
What the Need Is: A way to actively view wait times for restaurants in order to avoid having to wait before their dining experience.
Why the Need Exists: The need exists due to the consumer culture within our country that has placed a heavy focus on speed and the overall experience of convenience.
Outside the boundary:
Who: Consumers who either do not attend sit-down restaurants or those who do not consider wait times at a restaurant an important factor in their overall experience.
What the Need Is Not: The need is not for consumers who simply do not care about waiting at restaurants or do not have to experience this often enough to be concerned with it.
Alternative Explanations: Purchasing a product requires a certain amount of discomfort or inconvenience in order for the consumer to find enough conviction to actually purchase a solution to their problem. Consumers who do not place that much importance on this issue would not be convinced to buy this product or engage with my proposal.
Reflection:
After interviewing consumers outside of the boundary, I was able to see a new perspective and reality on the problem and solution at hand. While composing a hypothesis in the previous assignment, I thought that my solution would be beneficial to almost every consumer, I know realize this was naive of me to think. While there are many convenient products on the market, not all of them are bought and used by consumers, even if originally meant for a larger population. Some of the valid points made during these interviews were that customers may not always remember to check wait times before choosing a restaurant and even if they do, it would only be useful during peak meal times where waits are typically long. Speaking with those I thought would be inside my boundary but were actually not was interesting and allowed me to see a new perspective on the problem at hand.